One piece
of advice Routam offers in Chapter 7 is to introduce the writing process as a
whole, rather than step-by-step. This may seem odd as several of our other
Language Arts instructional strategies involve mini-lessons focusing on one
concept then banking these concepts which build off one another. She justifies
this by noting there is not research out there supporting the use of drills or
worksheets. Rather, having the whole presented to the student at once allows
them to learn more easily with more meaning. For this example, it is key for
the teacher to know each part of the writing process fully and be able to model
using each part rather than telling the students about each part. I have found
that this idea of showing rather than telling is successful, but sometimes hard
for me to carry out. When my students are not understanding a concept and I
have run out of ways to show them or
have them notice something that I want them to notice, I turn right to direct
teaching; I will tell them. While I
believe that student discovery is more authentic than me just lecturing to
them, it requires a special set of teacher-skills that develop with practice
and restraint. I am trying everyday to focus on providing opportunities for my
students to be discoverers. What are some strategies that allow students to
learn authentically without me telling them what to learn? Is there anything in
particular that works for you and your students?
Another
key piece of advice Routman suggests is to make writing meaningful to the
students. While not a hard concept to grasp, or even disagree with, finding
ways to do this take practice and thought. How can you help students chose
meaningful, but also worthwhile topics to write about? My mentor teacher helped
scaffold this very idea in my student’s writer’s notebooks. She took a page,
divided in into 4 sections and had them write down some things that 1) they
liked, 2) they didn’t like, 3) scared them, and 4) were some of their hobbies.
This allows students to have a reference for when they need to write about
something and can’t think of a topic. Routman suggests in Chapter 8 to allow
time for students to share their writing with peers. As a teacher, we need to
discuss with students how to listen to their peers and respond with
constructive comments and how to ask questions. What are some ways to
facilitate this in a productive way?
My students have a hard time with constructive peer interaction when it comes
to writing or any other content area. They have a difficult time knowing what
to say to their peers. Usually they take turns reading their writing piece and
sit to talk about irrelevant topics. Are
you seeing your mentor teacher provide opportunities for your students to
compose authentic writing? If so, what and why do you think it works?
There
are several opportunities to ‘finesse’ the literacy instruction in my classroom
as described in the Kersten/ Pardo article. I am seeing my mentor teacher do it
every day. We have several curriculum programs for language arts: DWA, DRA,
Making Meaning and Word Study. In each, my mentor teacher puts her own little
twist on the instruction to make learning meaningful and personal for our
students. How can a set curriculum fit each and every student? There are always
little tweaks that need to be made and accommodations that need to be accounted
for. I know for Word Study, the activities going along with each unit are do
not take a lot of effort on the student’s part and do not challenge their
thinking; sometimes, not even requiring the students to know the meaning of the
word they are studying! In order to accomplish the missing goals from the Word
Study curriculum, I could incorporate an activity that applies the learning in a new context. For example, asking the
students to write a sentence or paragraph using several of the words. I would
be looking for correct usage, as well as spelling accuracy. This way students
are studying for a purpose and will be able to extend their learning after the
spelling test at the end of the unit. What are some ways you see your mentor
teacher deviating a tad from a set curriculum? I know my mentor teacher and her
co-teacher have some strong feelings about some curriculum and have no problem ‘finessing’
their instruction. Do you feel comfortable as a beginning teacher to do the
same or do you think being able to do that come with experience and reputation?